Recently I was consulting on site. The task was easy enough in that the parameter was to write a specification. The issue arose when I needed to interact with another worker. The security specification was to work directly with his application. After working with him and attempting to explain why security was actually important, giving examples, etc., I was told directly that my security was "trampling" on his progress. As this sunk in, the conversation turned to another topic.
People in the enterprise are still having issues grasping the importance of security and their memories continue to lapse as it pertains to the breaches, the direct and indirect liability, and the short term loss of rapport with the community as the story breaks.
There continues to need to be the focus on security and its application to the enterprise along with applications. As long as management views this as a hindrance and a checked box, there will continue to be extensive issues.
Thank you.
Miel, LLC Cybersecurity Architecture, Design, and Engineering Cybersecurity architecture is a requirement in today's environment. If you don't address cybersecurity in your organization, there will be problems. Miel, LLC offers architecting and embedded systems hacking services provide proactive cybersecurity services to improve your defenses, so you aren't reactive. Miel, LLC Cybersecurity Architecture, Design, and Engineering 810-701-5511 charles.parker@mielcybersecurity.net
Wednesday, May 25, 2016
Wednesday, March 30, 2016
Malware-Genome
In
a world of constant change, one thing is constant-there will be more malware
coded every day. As attackers find new vulnerabilities and areas to attack, new
malware will be coded to exploit these. The number of new pieces of malware
introduced daily will also increase. This is a function of the increase in
computer and other connected electronics along with the criminal mind looking
to exploit a situation.
One
such piece is Genome. This was first detected on January 18, 2011 and is
engineered to attack the Windows systems. Granted this is over five years old,
however, this has been noted again in the wild. Although the users may be
careful, they may still click on the cute kitten picture or link in an email
from a third cousin the user did not know was in existence ever.
Description
Once
the user clicks on the malicious link or opens a file the Trojan begins the
download. Generally, this reaches out through port 80 to get.whitesmoke.com.
Once loaded, this notifies the C&C there is a new infected user, the
infected system is able to receive the malicious packets and other downloads,
receive any updates, and upload any data to the C&C from the infected user.
These programs and files are downloaded without the user’s consent or
knowledge. As more malware are downloaded to the user’s system, this may have
the system process much slower, freeze it, and eventually the user will receive
the infamous BSOD.
Mitigation
Hopefully
the users will have a sufficient amount of appreciation of info sec and listen
to the IT department. If this is on their personal system, the user would need
to in the least update their AV and download the new definitions. They should
then run a full system scan. This may pick up the malware.
This
sounds easy enough, however it may be difficult to remove. What makes this a
bit curious is unless this is completely removed, this will quasi-regenerate
via another download. This may also reside in the root. Another easy way to
verify this is done via a search for two files (utdqhz5i9inix.exe and
zlsrbvjm.exe).These generally indicate the user is infected with the Genome.
The user may still be infected even if these files are not present.
The
info sec engineers can also remind the users to watch for spam. They really
should not just open anything. They should also be reminded to not click on any
links or open attachments, especially the files with the “.exe” extension.
This
malware infection can be avoided with only a few steps and being careful with
certain emails.
Human Factor
A person
or group of people focused on a social engineering attack in general has the
benefit of experience and being keenly aware of the human character.
The
social engineering attacks use many tools to mislead the target into believing
their script. The commonality with the attacks is the human factor. As a member
of humanity, one common attribute most of the population internalizes is to be
helpful or provide assistance when asked. We tend to be social creatures and if
one of the groups needs assistance, one of the groups would offer to be there.
Recently
this has been applied to rather high profile services. A widely respected info
sec author/blogger’s PayPal account was also compromised. The social engineer
used the general attack methodology. As the target was well-known, the attacker
was able to search general and social media for his background data. With this
in hand, the attacker could call the service, and assume his identity. This
clearly is not optimal.
In yet
another highly publicized example, an Amazon customer also was victimized. In
this instance, the user had an account at Amazon, like so many others. Here,
however the attacker depended on the customer service representative’s good
nature and willingness to help the “customer” who seemingly needed it. Here the
“customer” did not have the product that was purchased, did not have the last
four digits of the credit card number (as it was his work credit card), he
really needed to get the report back to his manager, did not have access to the
account, did not know the expiration date of the card, etc. The only thing the
person knew was the card was a VISA. In utilizing statistics, there was in the
least a 33% opportunity to choose correctly. Given the prior conversation, the
customer service representative would probably have allowed the “customer” to
guess until correct.
Lessons to Apply
This
contact is yet another example of why there needs to be a better training
program. These need to consist not only of the usual presentation on the
negative aspects of when social engineering is a success. The people need not
to be fearful of asking simple, direct questions. If the wrong or inconclusive
answers are presented, the conversation should go no further.
Red Flags
There
were several read flags with their exercise in mental gymnastics. First,
chronologically, the “customer” wanted a refund even before the product
arrived. On its face this is exceptionally odd. As a rule of thumb and
industry, the person orders the product, receives it, decides it just will not
work, and asks to return it. This should have been a red flag.
Regarding
the credit card, the “customer” did not have it, did not have the last four
numbers on the card, could not even give the last two digits of the card, and
asked for the expiration date on the card. If the “customer” did not have the
card to verify the last four or two digits, how would the “customer” be able to
verify the card from the expiration date? The “customer” would not as this was
a farce.
The
“customer” said at one point the customer did not have the access to the
account. It only takes two pieces of data to do this with a computer. Clearly
the “customer” should have known the login and password.
Best Course
There is
a distinctly different course of action that should have been followed. By
following this the customer service representative should have used a bit of
common sense in comparison to bending over backward to give the “customer”
every opportunity to commit fraud and then helping the “customer” to log in.
When something starts to smell, much like what happened here, the
representative should start to review the situation and ask questions.
Lessons
Sys
Admins, please provide the training the staff needs. At times people can get
too caught up in their jobs and forget what they are also responsible for-info
sec and keeping other’s data safe. If not you may be breached and getting a
call from the government agencies.
New Year!
Each New Year brings with it the
opportunity to start fresh; learn from the prior year’s errors and victories.
This bifurcation between the years allows for this reflection. With the
upcoming year, there are a number of initiatives that the corporate CTO/CISO
can implement to better the business and further mitigate risks associated with
eh operations and business itself.
One action item for the corporation
to accomplish if it had not been done already is to hire a qualified
Information Security Engineer/Architect. This should be a top priority if it is
not already done. This person will be able to assess the enterprise, advise what
needed to be done, and begin to implement the changes.
Communicate with your staff and
ensure they follow these. One of the more profitable attacks that grew traction
over the last year was the ransomware of everyday consumers, manufacturers, and
hospitals, and also the executive pay scam. The former involves anyone at work
or home simply clicking on an image or opening a malicious file. The latter
involves a multi-step social engineering process with one of the staff members
as funds are wired from the business on the false behest of the C-level. To
mitigate this attack, people need to know they don’t have to click on
everything, including kitten pictures. The business can also communicate their
wiring processes and simply verify the email to mitigate this risk.
During the next year, a focus
should be on training the staff to better recognize social engineering
attempts. The training cannot be the same mindless, boring presentations with
graphs on PowerPoint slides. The training needs to be engaging and interesting.
The role of the training staff is not to entertain, but this helps with
knowledge retention over time. No training will be perfect; however every
little bit assists in mitigating the risks. The alternative is become a victim
of social engineering, and have to manage the issues arising from this.
Here is to a New Year with a focus
of securing the enterprise!
Healthcare
The problem with
healthcare and info sec is the primary objectives of healthcare. Fortunately
for all of us the directive of the healthcare industry is patient care. Prima
facie, this is common sense. The hospital or other facility in fulfilling its
mission has to share data (patient records, prescriptions presently being
taken, treatment plans, etc.) among multiple parties. This provides an
opportunity for breaches as the endpoints for attack increase exponentially.
Instead of one person or group having access, there are many others who require
this.
The increase in the
number of persons with access provides many more targets for social engineers.
This increase in vulnerable endpoints allows for work to be focused on
exploiting and breaching the healthcare provider. A not so gentle reminder of
this issue are the hospital breaches and encrypted files/servers, especially
the recent example in Hollywood with the ransomware payment of $17k, and the
infamous OPM breach.
To mitigate this, there
is a simple formula. The issue has been and will continue to be difficult for
the user to implement. The most direct integration strategy involves training.
The standard training regimen is completely applicable. With the data flow and
number of endpoints, coupled with the liability to the entity in the event of a
breach, additional training is reasonable. The staff members (nurses, nursing
assistants, physicians, physician assistants, and others) need to know what to
be aware of. The training would need to focus on the spear phishing, methods
social engineers use to gain the rapport of others, so the staff members are
aware of what modes of attack may be used.
With this being done,
the opportunity for a successful breach would be lowered.
Hacktivists
Social Engineering attempts are not
going to diminish in their numbers any time soon. This will be a persistent
threat indefinitely. It used to be in the early days (I am able to use this
term as my first experience was coding in BASIC and C in the 1980’s) that
“hackers” would work to breach a system as a badge earned and to build
credibility among peers. The attackers have been viewing this more as a
business and using social engineering for financial gain. Recently over $50M
was stolen from the aircraft manufacturer FACC. On January 19th it
was reported the Crela Bank, a Belgium bank, has a $75.8M claim due to the same
type of CEO fraud scam earlier reported on. In mid-February a hospital in
Hollywood paid $17K to receive the key for the encryption on their servers. The
hospital had to stop using their electronic medical records/electronic health
records (EMR/HER) and was using pen and paper due to the issue. These are not
the only high dollar incidents, but only the recent occurrences. As long as
money can be made, the social engineering will continue to be operationalized
as a business. This will also draw others to this nefarious line of work.
Hacktivists
may also be involved as a method to embarrass people or agencies, or to bring
the facts to the forefront. The hacktivists may be of any age and skill level.
In early October 2015, teen-age attacker(s) breached the CIA Director’s email.
Recently, the Director of National Intelligence email was breached. The
breaches were a product of social engineering third parties, e.g. Verizon, and
not the directly affected person.
One
lesson to be learned from this involves being vigilant, watching your accounts,
and authenticating people that call you claiming to be from a business. If the
users continue to be lackadaisical, there will continue to be issues. The
issues or lessons to learn from can be expensive and others yet more expensive.
Tuesday, October 20, 2015
Security through obscurity is not a valid or reliable plan
Security through obscurity still does not work in the long term. The hope with this camouflage is that the attackers won't notice you. That does not exactly work in reality. Granted there are higher value targets, and some lower value targets for the attackers. There is the case however where you are noticed by the attackers. It could be by accident, they saw one of your trucks, or this is a disgruntled ex-employee or customer.
It is always better to have a security plan in place. You never know when the business will be targeted. Although hindsight is 20/20, the foresight is not.
It is always better to have a security plan in place. You never know when the business will be targeted. Although hindsight is 20/20, the foresight is not.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)